L'8 luglio del 1593, nasceva a Roma Artemisia Gentileschi e, in ocasione del suo quattrocentoventisettesimo (427th) compleanno, Google dedica alla pittrice un "doodle" che si rifà, nella posa del corpo, a un suo celebre autoritratto oggi conservato al Kensington Palace di Londra, ma, a differenza dell'autoritratto, con il viso, dall'espressione risoluta, rivolto verso lo spettatore. I colori stessi del "doodle" richiamano i chiaroscuri caravaggeschi ed i colori che spesso ritroviamo nei quadri di Artemisia. Incredibile pensare che è solo nei primi decenni del '900 grazie ad alcuni studiosi tra cui Roberto Longhi, e soprattutto con la Mostra del Caravaggio e dei caravaggeschi  tenutosi a Milano nel 1951 che, sia Caravaggio che i Caravaggisti, e tra questi anche Artemisia, escono da un oblio durato tre secoli!

Viene spontaneo parlare della Gentileschi usando il nome, piuttosto che il cognome, un po' per non confonderla con il padre, Orazio Gentileschi, anche lui noto pittore; un po' perché si è parlato così tanto di lei che ci sembra di conoscerla. Infatti, grazie all'eccezionalità dei suoi quadri, al fatto di essere riuscita ad eccellere in un campo, ed un'epoca, dominato dagli uomini, e grazie alla triste e ben documentata vicenda personale dello stupro da parte del pittore, collega del padre, Agostino Tassi, Artemisia è diventata un'icona del femminismo moderno e le sue opere vengono spesso interpretate attraverso la lente delle sue vicende personali, tanto che c'è chi si chiede se, o fino a che punto, è opportuno interpretarle in questo modo? In basso, vi proponiamo una serie di video, articoli e podcast interessantissimi, alcuni dei quali provano a rispondere a questa domanda.

She had a turbulent personal life but that didn't stop Artemisia Gentileschi becoming one of the greatest painters of the 17th century. ln fact, as Catherine Fletcher reveals on the eve of  a National Gallery exhibition on the artist, trauma spurred Artemisia on to greater heights.

In 1620, the artist Artemisia Gentileschi was in the process of splitting up with her husband. In between the legal paperwork, she made a painting of the Old Testament heroine Yael. In the Book of Judges, Yael saves the Israelites by assassinating the Canaanite commander Sisera. Artemisia showed her in modern dress, poised to hammer a nail through Sisera's head. It's tempting to wonder quite what Artemisia's ex made of it all.

Once perceived as a novelty on account of her sex, Artemisia is now regarded as one of the most important European painters of the 17th century. She was an impressive entrepreneur with what art historian Mary Garrard has called "almost unreasonably grand ambition". Her extraordinary portrayals rework themes from biblical and classical sources to show women in control not only of their own destiny, but those of their people.

Judith, another biblical heroine, famously assassinated an enemy general, Horofernes. Artemisia, however, added her own visceral
spin to the killing, showing Judith in the act of beheading Holofernes, blood spurting from his neck as she puts the power of her arm into the sword.

Born in Rome in 1593, Artemisia was the daughter of Orazio Gentileschi, an artist influenced by the leading Italian painter Caravaggio. She appears to have had a sheltered childhood but one in which she was given the opportunity to acquire skills in painting - and, by her late teens, she was already producing spectacular art. Her earliest surviving work is Susanna and the Elders. Painted in 1610, it shows two older men spying on the virtuous Susanna in her bath. This was a popular biblical subject, but while many portrayals showed Susanna either oblivious to the Elders' gaze or even perhaps enjoying it, in Artemisia's painting

she is distressed by the experience. This is a depiction of female trauma, not a saucy entertainment.

The subject of the chaste Susanna may also have helped the young Artemisia fend off damaging rumours that suggested her father had encouraged her to model nude before an audience. Maintaining a reputation for chastity was vital to young women in the period. But just two years later, Artemisia's own reputation was put on trial in the most public and painful circumstances imaginable.

In May 1611 Artemisia had been raped by Agostino Tassi, a fellow painter. Tassi was supposed to be helping Artemisia develop her trompe I'oeil technique, but abused his position to pursue her - with the help of a woman called Tuzia, a close friend and tenant of the Gentileschi family. Tuzia, Artemisia testified, "tried to persuade me that Agostino was a well-mannered young man, courteous
to women, and that we would get along very well with each other". Persuaded that Tassi would marry her, Artemisia became the victim of ongoing sexual exploitation.

In March 1612, however, Orazio Gentileschi took his daughter's teacher to court. In the eyes of the legal system at the time, the
complaint was his: Tassi had 'deflowered' his virginal daughter, thereby compromising her chances of marriage.

Artemisia was subjected to a virginity test, carried out by two midwives, and tortured with thumbscrews in an attempt to ensure her testimony was truthful. The experience she recounted to the court was horrific: Tassi, she said, "pushed me in and locked the [bedroom] door. He then threw me onto the edge of the bed, pushing me with a hand on my breast, and he put a knee between my thighs to prevent me from closing them". He put a hand over her mouth "to keep me from screaming". Artemisia still "tried to scream as best I could, calling Tuzia. I scratched his face and pulled his hair... When I saw myself free I went to the table drawer and took out a knife and moved toward Agostino saying: 'I'd like to kill you with this knife because you have dishonoured me'." She didn't go through with the threat, but it is hardly surprising that many people have argued that Artemisia's paintings of powerful women betray her own trauma and temperament.

Tassi predictably claimed that not only had Artemisia agreed to have sex, but that she had been known to sleep around. Her father denied it in court. Agostino, he insisted, "cannot say that Artemisia has misbehaved with others, since he would be lying through his teeth, because from the day that he deflowered her he constantly put men around Artemisia's house to watch whoever entered and left, both day and night." Artemisia confirmed: "I never had any sexual relations with any other person besides the said
Agostino. It is true that Cosimo [a friend of Agostino] made all sorts of efforts to have me... but never did I consent."

Agostino and Cosimo had made the mistake of boasting about their pursuit of Artemisia to another man, Giovanni Battista Stiattesi, who now gave evidence against them. Stiattesi had other details to add, too, not least that Agostino was already married, had run off with his sister-in-law (technically incest, for which he had served time in jail), and had then hired contract killers to murder his wife. None of this endeared Tassi to the judges, who found against him. However, he seems to have served only eight months in prison before the case was dismissed.

Inclined to marry
Later the same year, Artemisia married Pierantonio Stiattesi, probably a relative of that key witness, a move that helped mend her reputation. He was a citizen of Florence, where the couple relocated early in 1613. Artemisia's dowry was probably invested in their business, to which Pierantonio brought useful city contacts. Within two years Artemisia had been commissioned to produce
three paintings for Cosimo II de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany. She then went on to paint an Allegory of Inclination  for the Casa Buonarroti, the house being established by Michelangelo's great-nephew to commemorate his celebrated relative. .

Artemisia's Florentine years were a whirl of work, child-bearing and financial juggling. In the course of seven years she had at least four - probably five - children. In Florence she became acquainted with the astronomer Galileo Galilei, who had recently published his groundbreaking treatise The Starry Messenger, and in 1616 she was the first female artist to become a member of the Florentine Academy, the Accademia delle Arti del Disegno. In 1618, she also embarked on a four-year affair with nobleman Francesco Maria Maringhi, a part of her story only

discovered in 2011 when a collection of letters came to light. Her husband apparently tolerated the relationship, at least for a while. this was not entirely unusual in the context of marriages of convenience, especially in a case like this where Maringhi's patronage was useful to the couple.

As Pierantonio pointed out in a letter to Maringhi, appearances mattered: "If you want to get ahead, you need to make a show of good taste and demonstrate that you live in comfort, because when people see that your house is in order, it makes all the difference and you enjoy much more credit." And to keep up appearances, he and Artemisia relied on credit to obtain the luxurious fashions that also featured in her paintings. So long as they were doing well, they could keep up repayments, but the loans became problematic when their marriage broke down.

With her affair having, once again, made her the centre of public scandal, Artemisia left Florence. Solely responsible now for the debts that had now once been shared with her husband, and facing the confiscation of her property, she moved back to Rome.

Artemisia spent the next decade first in Rome and then in Venice. More than a decade earlier, Rome had opened up its art academy, the Accademia di San Luca, to admit women, while Pope Urban VIII was an important patron of creative women, among them the artists Virginia da Vezzo and Maddalena Corvini, and the architect Plautilla Bricci. Artemisia herself did not join the academy in Rome, perhaps because she did not stay in the city for long before departing for Venice, but in Venice, too, she had access to a cultural scene known for its outspoken women. Among them was Arcangela Tarabotti, who became famous for her attack on the enclosure of unwilling women in nunneries.

Besides the biblical subjects for which she is best known, Artemisia also took inspiration from classical sources. Although she had not been fully literate at the time of the rape

trial, by the 1620s she had learnt to write and was clearly familiar with high culture. Her painting of Corisca and the Satyr  (c1635-37), in which a clever nymph evades an attempted seduction, has parallels with literary works by her female contemporaries. Like Yael and Judith, Corisca is an Artemisia heroine who uses trickery to outwit her opponent.

Honoured by kings
In 1630 Artemisia moved to Naples and there spent the remainder of her career, with the exception of a 1638 trip to London where her father was court painter to Charles I. Her Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting  was part of Charles's collection. By this time, as she wrote to Galileo, she had been "honoured by all the kings and rulers of Europe to whom I have sent my works".

She was not backward about asserting her talent directly. Hoping to obtain commissions from Francesco I d'Este, Duke of Modena, she sent a sample of work and a letter observing that: "I have served all the major rulers of Europe, who appreciate my work. . . it would provide the evidence of my fame... Therefore please forgive my daring but ambitiously honourable gesture."

In this later period, Artemisia's work included multiple female nudes, such as a Death of Cleopatra  and paintings of David and Bathsheba. Always alert to the practicalities of running a business, she complained that obtaining suitable models for this work was "very expensive" and "a big headache". She added: "When I find good ones, they fleece me, and at other times, one must suffer [their] pettiness with the patience of Job." By this time, demand for her art outstripped the works she herself was supplying, and - as was common in the period - members of her workshop produced paintings labelled the work of 'Artemisia', even though her own
involvement may have been limited.

When it came to marketing, Artemisia was a tough negotiator. In 1649 she wrote to Don Antonio Ruffo, a prominent collector, refusing him a discount: "I was mortified to hear that you want to deduct one third... I cannot accept a reduction, both because of the value of the painting and of my great need." She was "displeased that for the second time I am being treated as a novice". In a subsequent letter she did not back down, writing that Ruffo would "find the spirit of Caesar in this soul of a woman". She had overcome the barriers to women entering the profession by training in her father's household, but was still conscious that she was at risk of inferior treatment because of her sex. on receiving a drawing from her, one patron had then hired a male artist to do the work. "If I were a man," she wrote, "I can't imagine it would have turned out this way."

Artemisia died in c1654, but it would be more than 300 years before her legacy truly came to light. Even then, it remained fashionable to emphasise the details of her private life at the expense of her professional work, whether in relation to her rape, or her affair with Maringhi. Both are easily sensationalised, but they often carry the sexist implication that the scandal matters more than Artemisia's artistic output. Of course, her gender made a difference to her work. But it's high time we stopped looking at Artemisia's art only through the lens of her personal life. We rarely do that with her male contemporaries - so why should we do so with her?

Catherine Fletcher; BBC History Magazine; April, 2020.

Catherine Fletcher is a historian of Renaissance and early modern Europe. Her latest book is The Beauty and the Terror: An Alternative History of the ltalian Renaissance (Bodley Head, 2020)

Per acquistare il documentario su Maria Maddalena, e altri bei documentari di Waldemar Januszczak, visitate ZCZ Films.

Per finire, potete sfogliare online o scaricare in Pdf tutte le 498 pagine!, a colori!, del catalogo della mostra Orazio and Artemisia Gentileschi: Father and Daughter Painters in Baroque Italy, tenutasi a Roma e a New York nel 2002. Cliccate sull'immagine in basso. Buon compleanno Artemisia!

Oggi è scomparso il grande compositore Ennio Morricone, autore di alcune delle colonne sonore più belle che siano mai state scritte. Proprio la settimana scorsa ho visto per la prima volta, alla SBS on Demand, C'era una volta il West  di Sergio Leone e, come mi capita spesso quando vedo questi cosiddetti "vecchi" film, sono rimasto strabiliato dall'originalità del film e della musica di Morricone - l'uso ripetitivo di quelle poche note dell'armonica di Franco De Gemini come strumento narrativo è assolutamente straordinario!

Morricone ha composto centinaia di colonne sonore sia per il cinema che per la televisione, e ci sono decine e decine di compilation che ripropongono i brani più famosi del maestro. Tra questi, c'è l'album del 2004 del cellista Yo-Yo Ma che è bellissimo. Ecco L'estacy dell'oro (Ecstacy of Gold), tratto dal film Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo (The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly)  di Sergio Leone, interpretato da Yo-Yo Ma:

Altri due brani di Morricone che amo molto sono tratti dal Marco Polo  di Giuliano Montaldo del 1982, e dal film I giorni del cielo (Days of Heaven)  di Terrence Malick del 1978. Eccoli:

Per finire, ecco un paio di servizi della televisione italiana che riportano la notizia della morte di Morricone e ne rivisitano la vita e la carriera; un'intervista dell'archivio dell'Istituto Luce molto interessante in cui il compositore, anche se non proprio disteso, parla della sua carriera; e un bel documentario trasmesso dalla BBC nel 1995 che riflette brillantemente la genialità del maestro la cui musica continuerà ad accompagnare e ad ispirare le generazioni a venire.  

Evviva! Ci sono voluti "solo" 88 giorni di trattative, in un susseguirsi di colpi di scena, per creare il nuovo governo - un'inaspettata coalizione tra il Movimento 5 Stelle e la Lega che hanno poco in comune se non lo spirito (la retorica?) "anti-sistema" e "anti-europeista". È per questo che, prima di dare il via alla coalizione, i due partiti hanno firmato un programma di governo dal quale si capisce da subito che il nuovo governo sarà in rotta di collisione con l'Europa. Infatti il programma, tra gli obbiettivi proposti, prevede l'adozione della flat tax, auspicata dalla Lega; del reddito di cittadinanza (anche se in misura ridotta rispetto ad un vero e proprio reddito di cittadinanza come discusso nel recente e popolarissimo libro di Rutger Bregman Utopia for Realists: How We Can Build the Ideal World e molto più simile agli unemployment benefits che abbiamo in Australia), auspicata dal Movimento 5 Stelle; e l'abolizione o la modifica della legge Fornero (la riforma al sistema delle pensioni del 2011 il cui scopo era di ridurre le spese pensionistiche), auspicata da entrambi i partiti. Il costo di queste proposte, tra mancati introiti per lo stato e ulteriori spese sarà molto alto, quindi come farà il governo a finanziarle se non chiedendo all'Europa di permettere all'Italia di indebitarsi ancora di più? La scommessa della Lega e dei 5 Stelle è che, giocando duro soprattutto lì dove l'Europa mostra le sue incompetenze e fragilità, riusciranno a ottenere concessioni di rilievo da parte dell'Europa. E, in effetti, il gioco è cominciato da subito partendo dal fronte dei migranti con il divieto, il 9 giugno, da parte di Salvini, il neo-ministro degli interni, di far sbarcare in Italia una nave, l'Aquarius, con oltre 600 migranti, tra cui bambini e donne incinte. La decisione ha creato un putiferio in Italia ("Salvini gioca sulla pelle dei migranti") e in Europa, soprattutto in Francia ("Italia cinica e irresponsabile"). Nello stesso giorno però sbarcavano in Italia altre due navi con rispettivamente circa 400 e 230 migranti. È chiaro che, almeno per il momento, stiamo parlando di un gesto simbolico (ripetuto qualche giorno dopo e che indubbiamente si ripeterà ancora) che però ha avuto un grosso effetto in Europa tanto che il tema dei migranti ha dominato il recente summit del Consiglio europeo del 28 e 29 giugno conclusasi con numerose dichiarazioni di intenti ma poco di fatto.

Infatti, ciò che lascia perplessi è l'incapacità dell'Unione europea, così com'è, di trovare l'accordo tra i propri membri su tutta una serie di questioni importantissime, di intervenire in maniera risolutiva per risolvere problemi che già ci sono (i migranti; il conflitto in Siria; la crisi in Libia; le varie guerre civili in Africa; la salvaguardia dell'ambiente e del patrimonio artistico; la crescita asfittica dell'economia europea; la disoccupazione; il lavoro precario; i tagli di spesa sui servizi pubblici; il debito pubblico; la criminalità organizzata; la giustizia troppo lenta, almeno in Italia; lo strapotere delle multinazionali e del settore finanziario; i paradisi fiscali; la disuguaglianza eccessiva), di adottare misure per prevenire problemi che già appaiono sull'orizzonte (il cambiamento climatico; l'impatto della sempre crescente automazione; l'invecchiamento della popolazione), per non parlare poi di una completa mancanza di visione per l'Europa: il neoliberismo è agli sgoccioli, con che cosa verrà sostituito?; come vogliamo che sia l'Europa fra 50 o 100 anni? Gli unici a proporre visioni del futuro sono i vari Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, del mondo. Per quale motivo stiamo affidando il nostro futuro a persone così? Quindi, come si fa a dare torto a coloro che hanno votato per i partiti "anti-sistema" e "anti-europeisti"? È assolutamente tragico però che a farne le spese siano proprio i più deboli, quelli stipati all'inverosimile su gommoni nel mezzo di un Mediterraneo che, per secoli, è stato via di comunicazione tra popoli, ora ridotto a confine, presto armato, e cimitero.

Domani gli Italiani andranno finalmente a votare per il nuovo parlamento. Le elezioni si sarebbero dovute tenere nei primi mesi del 2017, in seguito alla schiacciante sconfitta del referendum di riforma costituzionale del dicembre 2016, promosso dall'allora Presidente del Consiglio Matteo Renzi, ma né il centrodestra, né il centrosinistra si sentivano pronti ad affrontare elezioni anticipate ed entrambi temevano una vittoria del Movimento 5 Stelle. Hanno quindi insistito che, prima di indire nuove elezioni, bisognasse finalmente modificare la legge elettorale allora in vigore e la nuova legge elettorale è stata approvata nell'ottobre del 2017.

​Durante questo periodo, i due maggiori partiti del centrodestra, Forza Italia, guidata dal redivivo Silvio Berlusconi, e la Lega (ex "Lega Nord" - la parola "Nord" debitamente "scaricata" per non offendere gli elettori meridionali), guidata da Matteo Salvini hanno ottenuto molti consensi soprattutto prendendo di mira gli immigrati irregolari, eppure i due capi di partito sono una coppia abbastanza strana e molti dubitano che una coalizione tra i due possa durare a lungo. Il centrosinistra intanto è in preda allo scompiglio - la lezione di Bernie Sanders e di Jeremy Corbyn è passata completamente inosservata. Il Movimento 5 Stelle è stato e continua ad essere accusato da parte dei principali mezzi d'informazione di non avere politiche concrete, di essere un partito "populista", di incompetenza, e di inesperienza - questi ultimi due ampiamente testimoniati, secondo i critici del Movimento, dall'operato del sindaco di Roma, Virginia Raggi. (È interessante - o dispiace, dipende dai punti di vista - notare come la retorica antieuropeista da parte sia della Lega che dei 5 Stelle sia diminuita notevolmente con l'avvicinarsi delle elezioni). Eppure, se uno ha un acconto Facebook italiano o ne segue uno, avrà certamente notato la valanga di post a favore del Movimento e del suo capo, Luigi Di Maio.

Pochi se la sentono di prevedere chi vincerà le elezioni, tantomeno quale partito o coalizione guiderà il paese, ma una cosa è certa: saranno elezioni affascinanti.           

Tomorrow Italians will finally be voting for a new parliament. Elections should have been held in early 2017 following the overwhelming defeat in December 2016 of the referendum on constitutional reform backed by the then Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, but neither the centre-right, nor the centre-left parties felt prepared for an election and both feared a Movimento 5 Stelle landslide. They argued therefore that it would be unwise to proceed with general elections until a longly yearned for new electoral law be introduced - law which was approved, with considerable controversy, by the parliament in October 2017.

During this time, the two main centre-right parties, Forza Italia, lead by the "comeback kid" Silvio Berlusconi, and la Lega (once "Lega Nord" - the "Nord" being dropped so as not to offend southern voters), lead by Matteo Salvini have gained quite a lot of popularity, in particular by targeting illegal migrants, yet the two leaders are an odd pair and many doubt that a coalition between the two parties will last. The centre-left is in disarray - Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn's lesson going unheeded. The Movimento 5 Stelle, has been and is constantly being accused by every major media organisation of a lack of concrete policies, of being a "populist" party, of incompetence, and of inexperience - the latter two amply demonstrated, according to the 5 Stelle's numerous critics, by Virginia Raggi's performance as mayor of Rome. (Interestingly - or disappointingly, depending on one's point of view - both La Lega and the 5 Stelle have curtailed their anti-European rhetoric.) Yet, if you have an Italian Facebook account, or are linked to one, you may well have noticed the constant stream of posts in favour of the Movimento 5 Stelle and its leader, Luigi Di Maio. 

No one is terribly willing to predict who will win this election, let alone predict which party or parties will govern the country, but it will definitely be fascinating to watch.  

Giacomo va in Italia per qualche settimana! Seguitelo su Instagram e date un'occhiata ad alcuni dei posti che visiterà durante il viaggio.

Giacomo is off to Italy for a few weeks! Follow him on Instagram and take a peak at some of the places he will visit during the trip.